Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2018  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 281--285

Age estimation using comprehensive chart for dental age estimation in Haryana population: A pilot study


Cheena Singh1, Kusum Singal2, Priyanka Kapoor3,  
1 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, GDC Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India
2 Department of Genetics, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana, India
3 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Cheena Singh
Officers Colony, House No. 10, Type 5, Near Agro Mall, Rohtak, Haryana
India

Abstract

Background: Dental age estimation by radiographic methods for forensic rationale is routinely applied to serve the judicial system. Of these, Demirjian system is most widely used, but its applicability in the Indian population, specifically Haryana population, is still lacking. Aim and Objective: This is a pilot study to evaluate Demirjian method in Haryana population using a comprehensive chart for dental age estimation (DAEcc) and establish a correlation between the chronological age (CA) and estimated age. Materials and Methods: Sample comprised 100 subjects (49 males and 51 females) 7–16 years of age. Orthopantomograms of these patients were traced and evaluated for Demirjian dental age computation using DAEcc and compared with CA. Results: A positive correlation was observed between CA and estimated age (R2 = 0.82 in males, R2 = 0.78 in females, and R2 = 0.80 in combined population). The paired t-test between CA and estimated age demonstrated that Demirjian method underestimates the dental age by 5.1 months, that is, 153 days in males (P = 0.04) and by 7.9 months, that is, 237 days in females (P = 0.01). There was an overall underestimation by 6.3 months (P = 0.001) in the entire study population. Conclusion: This pilot study supports the applicability of Demirjian method for age estimation in Haryana population and paves way for further studies in a larger sample in the same population to accurately establish the association between CA and dental age.



How to cite this article:
Singh C, Singal K, Kapoor P. Age estimation using comprehensive chart for dental age estimation in Haryana population: A pilot study.J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2018;30:281-285


How to cite this URL:
Singh C, Singal K, Kapoor P. Age estimation using comprehensive chart for dental age estimation in Haryana population: A pilot study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2021 Nov 28 ];30:281-285
Available from: https://www.jiaomr.in/text.asp?2018/30/3/281/243647


Full Text



 Introduction



Federation dentaire Internationale defines forensic odontology as “that branch of dentistry which, in the interest of justice, deals with the proper handling of dental evidence, and with proper evaluation and presentation of dental findings.” There are various applications of forensic odontology, and one of them is age estimation in neonates, adolescent, and adult. Dental age estimation (DAE) in adults plays an important role in forensic odontology. Nowadays in India, age estimation of an adult has been an archaic exercise. However, age estimation can be done in various cases including juvenile crime, sexual assault, and domestic disputes.[1],[2] An internationally known newspaper the “Times of India” (dated September 11, 2015) highlighted the need for determination of exact chronological age (CA) of players by means other than birth certificate.[3],[4] A viable alternative for the estimation of age is DAE method and the establishment of its correlation with CA of the individual.[5]

The method of DAE is simple, user-friendly, and a less time-consuming method which can be easily applied by undergraduate students. The techniques routinely used for DAE are based on emergence and eruption sequence of the teeth, or by developmental stage analysis using orthopantomogram (OPG) or Panorex.[6],[7] Demirjian method is one nondestructive radiographic strategy which was at first conducted in 1973 using OPGs for assessing the age of children and adolescents by measurement of the apical opening of the mandibular teeth. It is considered to be the best method and gold standard because it is less prone to intraobserver error.[8],[9],[10] A number of studies on different population and different ethnic groups were conducted using this method.[11],[12]

This study was conducted in Haryana population with the aim to check the applicability of Demirjian method. The purpose of this study is to derive a method of estimating overall dental maturity or dental age by observing the stage of development of each tooth. The study is conducted over child population in Haryana and it is a pioneer study.

Aims

The study was aimed to evaluate Demirjian method using a comprehensive chart for dental age estimation (DAEcc) and to establish a correlation between CA and estimated age in Haryana population.

 Materials and Methods



Sample collection

This study was conducted with an aim to assess dental age using DAEcc and to establish a correlation between CA and estimated age. A total sample of 100 panoramic radiographs (49 males and 51 females) were collected and evacuated within age ranging from 7 to 16 years. Each subject who participated in the study was briefed about the purpose of the study, and a written informed consent was obtained. Relevant data were collected and performa was filled. Study proposal was approved by the Institutional Human Ethical Committee, PDIDS Rohtak. The following inclusion and exclusion criteria were considered.

Inclusion criteria

Age ranging from 7 to 16 yearsOrthodontic treatmentGood oral hygiene.

Exclusion criteria

Any patients undergoing treatment from a psychiatrist for psychological disordersFull denture wearerPatients with ankylosisAgenesis of teeth/any congenital anomaliesPoor quality/image artifacts of panoramic radiographsSubjects with a history of third molar extraction.

Materials

The study group comprised 100 OPGs, 51 were females and 49 were males, with age ranging from 7 to 16 years.

Armamentarium

Panorex (printed film)DAEccREGE-LED view boxTracing sheetsSharpened lead pencil (Camel)Camel eraser.

Methodology

Using REGE-LED view box, tracings of 100 panoramic radiographs (only seven permanent left mandibular teeth 31–37) were done on tracing paper to see the calcification stages of the seven permanent left mandibular teeth [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]Comparison of traced teeth was done with DAEcc to identify the correct stage, assign the corresponding score, and finally calculate the total score for subsequent dental age assessment, that is, estimated age [Figure 5]Data were recorded, analyzed, and sent for statistical analysis for results.{Figure 1}{Figure 2}{Figure 3}{Figure 4}{Figure 5}

 Results



The study sample consisted of 100 subjects (49 males and 51 females) with age range of 7–16 years [Figure 6]. T-tests were used to assess the difference between CA and estimated age [Table 1]. There were no significant differences between the two age categories when the whole sample was analyzed (P = 0.298). A strong correlation was found between CA and estimated dental age [Table 2]. The R value is 0.655 which represents the simple correlation and, therefore, indicates a high degree of correlation. Chronological age can be explained by the Independent variable, Estimated age using the Demerijians method. In this case, 42.9% can be explained, which is very large [Table 3]a. Also, the regression model predicts the outcome variable significantly well. This indicates the statistical significance of the regression model that was applied. Here, P < 0.0005 which is less than 0.05 and indicates that, overall, the model applied is significantly good enough in predicting the outcome variable [Table 3]b. There was no significant difference between Chronological Age (in years) and Estimated age using the Demerijians method (in years) [Figure 7]. Pearson's correlations revealed strong positive associations between dental and CA [Figure 8].{Figure 6}{Table 1}{Table 2}{Table 3}{Figure 7}{Figure 8}

R2 value indicates how much of the dependent variable, CA, can be explained by the independent variable, estimated age, using Demirjian method. In this case, 42.9% can be explained, which is very large [Table 4]. Regression model predicts the outcome variable significantly well. This indicates the statistical significance of the regression model that was applied. Here, P < 0.0005 which is less than 0.05 and indicates that overall, the model applied is significantly good enough in predicting the outcome variable [Table 5]. The table of coefficients provides us with information on each predictor variable and necessary information to predict CA from estimated age [Table 6].{Table 4}{Table 5}{Table 6}

 Discussion



Tooth eruption and tooth calcification are the two occasions that can be used to quantify dental age in kids and teenagers. The strategy by Demirjian et al. is the most profoundly suggested and created of all dental age studies.[13] Numerous examinations have explored the precision of Demirjian's strategy and their outcomes shift. A few creators found that Demirjian's strategy was precise on the contemplated population, while others featured different impediments of the technique.[14],[15] Consequently, this technique was evaluated by Griffin and Malan with accentuation on its conceivable legal utilize and delivered that this simple method can be used as a part of age estimation in the field of forensic dentistry due to its less error rate.[16],[17]

Literature shows DAE using Demirjian strategy in Northeastern Turkish children, Malay population, Western Chinese children, Malaysian children, Belgaum population, and Lucknow children.[18],[19],[20],[21]

This study was conducted with the aim and objective to assess the dental age using OPGs in Haryana population and to compare the CA of the individual with dental age using Demirjian method. The study included 49 males and 51 females. A strong correlation was found between CA and estimated dental age in this study, which in accordance with outcomes of the other studies conducted by different researchers.[18],[19],[20],[21]

Higher R-value shows a significant correlation. Regression statistics and regression model indicate a higher degree of correlation between the independent variable with estimated age. In any case, our investigation approves the utilization of Demirjian framework in North Indian population. The condensed DAEcc as demonstrated in our examination is less tedious and is anything but difficult to translate, consequently making it a potential device for measurable age estimation in a vast example of North Indian population in future investigations.

 Conclusion



In the light of the finding of this study, it can be concluded that in the evaluation of dental age, the phase of calcification can be a solid marker as the teeth logically calcify with unequivocal age. It is based on the substantial development of teeth and is the nondestructive approach forage estimation in children. The sensibly great outcomes acquired in this study declare the utilization of Demirjian's 8 teeth strategy in Haryana Population. It is a beneficial method to apply the Indian equations locally inside particular areas, but in huge examples, and furthermore test the strategy on population-specific tests in genuine measurable situations where all-encompassing radiographs are available. This would in future prompt the advancement of the provincial database in different populations.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the parents of minors have given their consent on the behalf of their children.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Chaudhry K, Agarwal A, Rehani U. Applicability of Demirjian's Method for Dental Age Estimation. Indian J Dent Sci 2014;3:1-4.
2Cruz-Landeira A, Linares-Argote J, Martínez-Rodríguez M, Rodríguez-Calvo MS, Otero XL, Concheiro L. Dental age estimation in Spanish and Venezuelan children. Comparison of Demirjian and Chaillet's scores. Int J Legal Med 2010;124:105-12.
3Deepak P, Asha ML, Bhirwani S, Anupama, Raja JV, Srilakshmi J. Age Estimation By Measuring Open Apices of Lower Erupted and Non-Erupted Permanent Teeth Among 5-15 Years Old - A Digital Orthopantomograph Study. Med Res Chron 2015;2:633-64.
4Muller-Bolla M, Lupi-Pégurier L, Quatrehomme G, Velly AM, Bolla M. Age Estimation from Teeth in Children and Adolescents. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:1-9.
5Hägg U, Matsson L. Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: The accuracy and precision of three methods. Eur J Orthod 1985;7:25-34.
6Hedge RJ, Sood PB. Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: Radiographic evaluation of dental age in 6 to 13 years children of Belgaum using Demirjian methods. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2002;20:132-8.
7Anamaria J, Luminita L, Mariana P, Cristina B, Chibelean M, Eugen B. Dental age assessement using study Dermirjian's method-A Radiographic. Eur Sci J 2014;10:51-60.
8Prabhakar AR, Panda AK, Raju OS. Applicability of Demirjian's method of age assessment in children of Davangere. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2002;20:54-62.
9Ahmed RO, Fadel E, Zeidan A, Khaled K, Mohamed Z. Age estimation and dental maturity for Sudanese children using Demirjian's system. J Med Med 2013;4:123-7.
10Sinha S, Umapathy D, Shashikanth MC, Misra N, Mehra A, Singh AK. Dental age estimation by Demirjian's and Nolla's method: A comparative study among children attending a dental college in Lucknow (UP). J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2014;26:27-35.
11Wolf TG, Thomas G, Briseño-Marroquín B, Angelika C, Michael P, Thomas VM, et al. Dental age assessment in 6- to 14-year old German children: comparison of Cameriere and Demirjian methods. BMC Oral Health 2016;16:1-88.
12Kumar VJ, Gopal KS. Reliability of age estimation using Demirjian's 8 teeth method and India specific formula. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011;3:19-22.
13Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner M. A New System of Dental Age Assessment. Human Biology 1973;45:211-27.
14Sushil NB, Patil N, Swapnil N, Kamble D, Seema D, Tushar M, et al. Reliability of Third Molar Development for Age Estimation by Radiographic Examination (Demirjian's Method). J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:ZC25-8.
15Nik-Hussein NN, Kee KM, Gan P. Validity of Demirjian and Willems methods for dental age estimation for Malaysian children aged 5-15 years old. Forensic Sci Int 2011;204:208.e1-6.
16Ana OE, Elisabeta B, Ancar T, Alexandru O. Estimation of child's biological age based on tooth development. Rom J Leg Med 2011;19:115-24
17Patel P, Agarwal N, Agravat D, Ashutosh, Manjunath SM, Patil P. Applicability of Demirjian Technique of Age Estimation on Children and Adolescents of Ahmedabad City. J Adv Med Dent Scie 2014;2:37-41.
18Mani SA, Naing L, John J, Samsudin AR. Comparison of two methods of dental age estimation in 7-15-year-old Malays. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008;18:380-8.
19Jain V, Kapoor P, Miglani R. Demirjian approach of dental age estimation: Abridged for operator ease. J Forensic Dent Sci 2016;8:177-77.
20Ashish WM, Panjab WV, Tushar P. Correlation of Radiographic and Chronological Age in Human by using Demirjian's Method: A Radiographic Study. Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology 2011;23:1-4.
21Chen JW, Guo J, Zhou J, Liu RK, Chen TT, Zou SJ. Assessment of dental maturity of western Chinese children using Demirjian's method. Forensic Sci Int 2010;197:119-24.