Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Search Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 212
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
GUEST EDITORIAL
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 32  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 205-208

Review of salivary diagnostics – A current scenario


Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Tamil Nadu Government Dental College and Hospital, Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission27-Jul-2020
Date of Acceptance12-Aug-2020
Date of Web Publication29-Sep-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sadaksharam Jayachandran
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Tamil Nadu Government Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600003
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_159_20

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Human saliva is produced by the three major salivary glands (the parotid gland, submandibular gland, and sublingual glands) and minor salivary glands. It contains several hormones, antibodies, cytokines, proteins, enzymes, and antimicrobial constituents that act as biomarkers. It also contains variable amounts of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), mucosal transudate, desquamated epithelial cells, bacteria, viruses, fungi, food debris, microorganisms, serum, and some blood derivatives. Saliva has simple collection methods (non-invasive), handling procedure, reliable sensitivity and specificity, good cooperation from patients, and the possibility to perform dynamic studies. Salivary analysis can determine various systemic diseases, metabolic disorders, and infections. Hence, it serves as a potential diagnostic and prognostic tool with widespread clinical and research applications in various fields of science and medicine.

Keywords: Biomarker, cancer, COVID-19, forensic, saliva, salivomics


How to cite this article:
Jayachandran S. Review of salivary diagnostics – A current scenario. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2020;32:205-8

How to cite this URL:
Jayachandran S. Review of salivary diagnostics – A current scenario. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 5];32:205-8. Available from: https://www.jiaomr.in/text.asp?2020/32/3/205/296577






   Introduction Top


Human saliva harbors major biomolecules that are evident in blood or urine. The utilization of saliva to evaluate and monitor the health and disease states of an individual is the main goal for diagnosis, prognosis, and research.[1],[2] It is produced by the three major salivary glands (the parotid gland, submandibular gland, and sublingual glands) and minor salivary glands distributed throughout the mouth with a total volume of the saliva of 750–1000 mL daily.[3] The secretions of all the minor and major salivary glands contribute to the whole saliva, which is a hypotonic fluid composed of greater than 99% water and less than 1% proteins and salts.[4],[5] It also contains variable amounts of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), mucosal transudate, desquamated epithelial cells, bacteria, viruses, fungi, food debris, microorganisms, serum, and some blood derivatives. The stimulated saliva or the mixed saliva collected from the mouth is a complex mixture, which is secreted in response to masticatory or gustatory stimulation. The resting flow rate of the whole saliva is 0.2-0.4 mL/min, and on stimulation, the rates increase to 0.2-0.6 mL/min for the whole saliva. The pH of the whole saliva varies from 6.4 to 7.4. The concentration and volume of saliva may be influenced by circadian rhythm, stimuli, and several functional secretory units.[3],[6] Salivary analysis can determine various disorders/diseases like Sjogren's syndrome, Cystic Fibrosis, acute myocardial infarct, cancer, periodontal disease, stress, calcium disorders, etc., They also aid in the detection of virus (Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Human Herpesvirus, Epstein-Barr virus, Cytomegalovirus, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C) and bacteria (Helicobacterpylori, Streptococcus species).[7]

Saliva is a biological fluid that has simple collection methods, handling procedure, reliable sensitivity and specificity, good cooperation from patients, and the possibility to perform dynamic studies.[8] It is a complex fluid that contains several hormones, antibodies, cytokines, proteins, enzymes, and antimicrobial constituents that facilitate their associations with various systemic diseases.[9] Human saliva also contains approximately 2400 compounds that can be specific biomarkers associated with cellular motility, with cell proliferation, signaling molecular pathways, and to the immune system.[8] The clinical application of salivary diagnosis is widespread in dentistry, oncology, forensic medicine, infectious diseases, autoimmune disease, endocrinology, cardiology, nephrology, pharmacology, pharmacotherapy, and epidemiology.

The whole saliva is collected by draining method, spitting, suction method, or swabbing method. The glandular saliva or gland specific saliva is collected according to the type of gland. The parotid saliva is collected using a cannula or Lashley cup, or modified Carlson Crittenden device. The submandibular saliva is collected using suction, cannulation or segregator method. Labial and buccal saliva can be collected using the periopaper/sialopaper absorbent method.[10] Sialometry is salivary flow rate measurements, and sialochemistry is an analysis of salivary composition.[11] Sialometry is used to compare the secretory capacities of the major salivary glands and secretory flow rates (unstimulated with stimulated flow rates).[12] Sialochemistry is used to determine gland dysfunction and its impact on the oral environment, including the mucosa. It also analyzes homeostatic fluctuations as a result of circulatory, innervations, or hormonal adjustments by the assessment of organic and inorganic elements.[13] Genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics have aided in the discovery and development of salivary biomarkers, which have been studied with liquid chromatography (LC), capillary electrophoresis (CE), gel electrophoresis, nuclear magnetic resonance, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), radioimmunoassays (RIA), lectin probe analysis, atomic absorption flame photometry, spectrophotometry, high-performance liquid chromatography, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis followed by mass spectrometry, reverse-phase LC, quantitative PCR (qPCR), reversed-phase liquid and hydrophilic interaction chromatography, and colorimetric assays.[7]

Saliva serves as a diagnostic tool in the early detection of various cancers such as oral cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, and stomach cancer.[14] The elevated levels of HER2/neu in the saliva are detected in breast cancer patients.[15] A logistic regression model with the combination of four messenger RNA salivary biomarkers (KRAS, MBD3L2, ACRV1, and DPM1) is used in the identification of pancreatic cancer.[16] Three salivary proteins have been linked to gastric cancer: triosephosphate isomerase (TPI1), cystatin B (CSTB), and deleted in malignant brain tumors 1 protein (DMBT1).[17] Three salivary tumor markers (tissue polypeptide antigen [TPA], Cyfra 21-1, and cancer antigen CA-125) are used in the detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma.[7] The increase in salivary IL-6 is present in leukoplakia and OSCC.[18] Seven mRNA transcripts [BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1), FGF19 (fibroblast growth factor 19), FRS2 (fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2), CCNI (cyclin I), GREB1 (growth regulation by estrogen in breast cancer 1), EGFR, and LZTS1 (leucine zipper, putative tumor suppressor 1)] are present in the saliva of lung cancer patients.[2] Spectroscopic analysis of saliva aids in discriminating oral premalignancy and malignancy.[19] NADH, FAD, and porphyrin levels and photophysical characteristics show significant molecular level changes during the transformation of normal into cancer.[20]

The saliva acts as an essential and emerging tool in forensic dentistry. The cells in saliva contain mitochondrial DNA and genomic DNA that are very useful in individual identification.[14] Cells present in the saliva can be used to determine the sex by detecting the presence of sex chromatin and also by determining sex hormone level.[21] Genetic fingerprinting of epithelial cells deposited in saliva can be used in ABO profiling.[22] Species identification is done using a monoclonal antibody to determine species salivary immunoglobulin A (sIgA) using the ELISA technique.[7] The amelogenin gene from saliva exhibits two bands in males (XY) and one band in females (XX). These differences in amelogenin gene expression allow for gender differentiation.[22]Streptococcus mutans is a common bacterium in oral microbiota. The strains of this organism are acquired during birth and persist throughout life. Subtyping this species can aid in identification methods.[22]

Cigarette consumption detection, organic substances detection, heavy metal intoxication detection, and hormone detection can be done using salivary analysis by Gas Chromatography or the ELISA technique. Cigarette consumption on the active smoker or nicotine intoxication on passive smoker can be detected by determining the salivary cotinine level using RIA or the ELISA technique.[7] Metals can be detected in saliva by using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy or Mass Spectroscopy technique. Cadmium, Lead, Mercury, Nickel, Zinc, etc., can be analyzed through saliva.[23] RIA is used to detect the presence and determine the quantity of testosterone, progesterone, estradiol cortisol, and cortisone in saliva.[7],[21]

Salivaomics is the integrative study of saliva and its constituents, functions, and related techniques by genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics.[24] Genomics extends its application to a salivary liquid biopsy which is used to detect mutations. The clinical testing of ctDNA (circulating tumor DNA) in body fluids is referred to as liquid biopsy that most noted is in lung cancer, where three mutations (L858R, exon 19del, and T790M) in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene can be therapeutically targeted to have an impact on the survival of patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma.[25] Genomics can also aid as a prognostic marker in HPV-related oral cancers and identify various HPV subtypes as low, medium, or high risk as an indicator of overall risk for HPV-related oral carcinoma.[2] Proteomic analysis of saliva is commonly used in the diagnostics of oral diseases and general disorders such as glossodynia, oral candidiasis, head and neck squamous cell cancer, Sjogren's syndrome, autism, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, fibromyalgia, lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and pancreatic cancer.[14] Salivary exRNAs have been identified to allow the detection of many various diseases like oral squamous cell carcinoma, resectable pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and breast cancer.[14]

Salivary levels of creatinine is found to be higher in chronic kidney disease.[26] Salivary biomarkers have been recently explored as a screening tool for obesity and diabetes mellitus.[14] Salivary markers like TAU proteins are elevated in some neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's disease.[27] Carbamazepine, digoxin, phenytoin, primidone, ethosuximide, irinotecan, cisplatin, diazepam, lithium, metoprolol, paracetamol, theophylline, procainamide, quinine, or valproic acid levels are detected in saliva.[28] Free fatty acid, ischemia modified albumin, intercellular adhesion molecule, troponin, creatine kinase, and myoglobin are detected in saliva in patients with cardiovascular disease. Cortisol levels are elevated in physiological stress and keratin levels in systemic sclerosis.[8] Three protein biomarkers (a-enolase, cathepsin D [CPD], and ß2-microglobulin [ß2m]) and three mRNA biomarkers (guanylate binding protein 2 [GBP-2], myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen [MNDA], and low-affinity IIIb receptor for the Fc fragment of IgG) were elevated in saliva of patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome.[14] Tissue anti transglutaminase antibodies are present in celiac disease.[29] Increased levels of prostaglandin PGE2 and decreased activity of protease and EGF are present in the saliva of cystic fibrosis patients.[7]

Helicobacterpylori is a bacteria commonly isolated from saliva. Cytomegalovirus, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, herpes virus, Epstein Barr virus, Zika virus can be isolated from the saliva. Rarely, the level of salivary antibodies enables the detection of morbillivirus (measles), paramyxoviridae (mumps), and togaviridiae (rubella). Fungal local infections, like candidiasis, have been diagnosed in saliva. Low titers of Human Immunodeficiency (HIV-1) virus and high levels of HIV-1 RNA and antigens can routinely be measured in saliva. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor is a polypeptide found in saliva, antagonizes the HIV-1 infection and leads to low titers of infectious virus.[30] Oromucosal transudate can be used as a screening diagnostic tool for HIV.[31]

The production of SARS-CoV-specific secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) in the saliva has been seen in the animal models intranasally immunized.[32] SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in the saliva of confirmed patients with COVID-19, even up to the 11thday after hospitalization, in one of the cases.[32] The positive rate of COVID-19 in patients' saliva can reach 91.7%, and saliva samples can also cultivate the live virus.[33] The presence of coronavirus in the salivary fluid can be from either salivary glands or GCF or respiratory tract secretions.[34] The ACE2 epithelial cells of the salivary glands are an initial target for the SARS-CoV. Self-collected saliva samples have comparable SARS-CoV-2 detection sensitivity to nasopharyngeal swabs from mild and subclinical COVID-19 cases.[35] The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 detection from saliva is comparable, if not superior to nasopharyngeal swabs in early hospitalization and is more consistent during extended hospitalization and recovery.[36]

Age changes in the salivary glands are common and prominent in the parotid particularly. The gradual replacement of parenchyma with fatty tissue increased dryness, and the viscosity of saliva are common. Hypersalivation is a clinical feature of rabies, heavy metal poisoning, and during consumption of few drugs.[37] Hyposalivation is a clinical feature of Sjogren's syndrome, diabetes mellitus, diabetes insipidus, amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, and certain viral infections.[37] The salivary pH is altered in gastroesophageal reflux disease.[38] Salivary pH alters the growth of microorganisms which aids as an essential tool. Porphyromonas gingivalis grows at a pH of 6.5–7.0, Prevotella intermedia grows at a pH of 5.0–7.0, and Fusobacterium nucleatum grows at a pH of 5.5–7.0.[39] Salivary pH in patients with chronic generalized gingivitis is alkaline than with chronic generalized periodontitis which is more acidic.[39] Salivary flow rate, salivary viscosity, salivary pH, and salivary buffering capacity are lower in patients with high dental caries.[40] pH and amylase levels of saliva are found to be altered and prognostic factors in cancer. Lower pH decreased salivary flow, increased aciduric, and acidogenic lactobacilli are observed during radiotherapy.[41]


   Conclusion Top


Saliva reflects the physiological and pathological state of the body, and it is a biofluid that is emerging as a diagnostic and prognostic tool. Owing to the abundance of biomarkers present and noninvasive nature of the fluid, saliva can be potentially used as a diagnostic modality for various diseases and disorders. The newly emerging tools and rapidly developing technological perspectives can broadly widen the research area in salivary diagnostics.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Lee JM, Garon E, Wong DT. Salivary diagnostics. Orthod Craniofac Res 2009;12:206-11.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Punyadeera C, P D Slowey. 2013. Saliva as an emerging biofluid for clinical diagnosis and applications of MEMS/NEMS in salivary diagnostics in K. Subramani, W. Ahmed, J. K. Hartsfield Jr., eds. Nanobiomaterials in clinical dentistry, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kumar GS. Orban's Oral Histology & Embryology. 15th ed. New Delhi: Elsevier India; 2019. p. 465.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wang X, Kaczor-Urbanowicz KE, Wong DTW. Salivary biomarkers in cancer detection. Med Oncol 2016;34:7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Aps JKM, Martens LC. Review: The physiology of saliva and transfer of drugs into saliva. Forensic Sci Int 2005;150:119-31.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Glick M, Feagans WM. Burket's Oral Medicine. 12th ed. Connecticut: People's Medical Publishing Group; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Jessica J, Auerkari E. Saliva as a diagnostic tool in forensic odontology. J Dentomaxillofacial Sci 2019;4:124.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Gupta K, Gupta J. Salivary diagnostics-A review. J Adv Res Dent Oral Heal 2016;1:21-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Roi A, Rusu L, Roi C, Luca R, Boia S, Munteanu R. A new approach for the diagnosis of systemic and oral diseases based on salivary biomolecules. Dis Markers 2019;2019:1-11.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Priya Y, Prathibha KM. Methods of collection of saliva-A review. Int J Oral Heal Dent 2017;3:149-53.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kalk WWI, Vissink A, Stegenga B, Bootsma H, Nieuw Amerongen AV, Kallenberg CGM. Sialometry and sialochemistry: Anon-invasive approach for diagnosing Sjögren's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:137-44.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Falcão DP, Mota LMH da, Pires AL, Bezerra ACB. Sialometry: Aspects of clinical interest. Rev Bras Reumatol 2013;53:525-31.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Michels LFE. Sialometry and sialochemistry. In: Graamans K, Van Den Akker H, editors. Diagnosis of Salivary Gland Disorders. Dordrecht: Springer; 1991.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kaczor-Urbanowicz K, Carreras-Presas C, Aro K, Tu M, Garcia-Godoy F, Wong D. Saliva diagnostics-Current views and directions. Exp Biol Med 2016;242:459-72.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Streckfus CF, Dubinsky WP. Proteomic analysis of saliva for cancer diagnosis. Expert Rev Proteomics 2007;4:329-32.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Zhang L, Farrell JJ, Zhou H, Elashoff D, Akin D, Park N, et al. Salivary transcriptomic biomarkers for detection of resectable pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 2010;138:949-57.e1-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Xiao H, Zhang Y, Kim Y, Kim S, Kim J, Kim K, et al. Differential proteomic analysis of human saliva using tandem mass tags quantification for gastric cancer detection. Sci Rep 2016;6:22165.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Panneer Selvam N, Sadaksharam J. Salivary interleukin-6 in the detection of oral cancer and precancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2015;11:236-41.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Jaychandran S, Meenapriya PK, Ganesan S. Raman Spectroscopic Analysis of Blood, Urine, Saliva and Tissue of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders and Malignancy-A Diagnostic Study. Int J Oral Craniofac Sci 2016;2:011-014. DOI: 10.17352/2455-4634.000013.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Pappu R, Manoharan Y, Gnanatheepam E, Ramamoorthy S, Prakasarao A, Sadaksharam J, et al. Correlation of metabolites in saliva and in vivo tissue of oral cancer patients based on fluorescence spectral deconvolution. 2020:47.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Saxena S, Kumar S. Saliva in forensic odontology: A comprehensive update. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2015;19:263-5.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
22.
Shailja C. Saliva as a forensic tool. J Dent Probl Solut 2018;5:26-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Michalke B, Rossbach B, Göen T, Schäferhenrich A, Scherer G. Saliva as a matrix for human biomonitoring in occupational and environmental medicine. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2015;88:1-44.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Dawes C, Wong D. Role of saliva and salivary diagnostics in the advancement of oral health. J Dent Res 2019;98:133-41.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Wei F, Lin C-C, Joon A, Feng Z, Troche G, Lira M, et al. Noninvasive saliva-based EGFR gene mutation detection in patients with lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;190:1117-26.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Venkatapathy R, Govindarajan V, Oza N, Parameswaran S, Pennagaram Dhanasekaran B, Prashad KV. Salivary creatinine estimation as an alternative to serum creatinine in chronic kidney disease patients. Int J Nephrol 2014;2014:742724. doi: 10.1155/2014/742724.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Shi M, Sui Y-T, Peskind E, Li G, Hwang H, Devic I, et al. Salivary tau species are potential biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2011;27:299-305.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Etter J-F. A longitudinal study of cotinine in long-term daily users of e-cigarettes. Drug Alcohol Depend 2016;160:218-21.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Martí-Álamo S, Mancheño-Franch A, Marzal-Gamarra C, Carlos-Fabuel L. Saliva as a diagnostic fluid. Literature review. J Clin Exp Dent 2012;4:e237-43.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Angelica MD, Fong Y. The mouth: A gateway or trap for HIV? AIDS 2010;23:5-16.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Jayachandran S, Suhanya. Qualitative immunoassay for detection of antibodies to HIV 1/2 in oral mucosal transudate-A diagnostic study. J Int Coll Dent 2011;56:25-9.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Lu B, Huang Y, Huang L, Li B, Zheng Z, Chen Z, et al. Effect of mucosal and systemic immunization with virus-like particles of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus in mice. Immunology 2010;130:254-61.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
To KK-W, Tsang OT-Y, Yip CC-Y, Chan K-H, Wu T-C, Chan JM-C, et al. Consistent detection of 2019 novel coronavirus in saliva. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:841-3. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa149.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Sabino-Silva R, Jardim ACG, Siqueira WL. Coronavirus COVID-19 impacts to dentistry and potential salivary diagnosis. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:1619-21.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Kojima N, Turner F, Slepnev V, Bacelar A, Deming L, Kodeboyina S, et al. Self-collected oral fluid and nasal swabs demonstrate comparable sensitivity to clinician collected nasopharyngeal swabs for Covid-19 detection. medRxiv 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.11.20062372.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Wyllie AL, Fournier J, Casanovas-Massana A, Campbell M, Tokuyama M, Vijayakumar P, et al. Saliva is more sensitive for SARS-CoV-2 detection in COVID-19 patients than nasopharyngeal swabs. medRxiv. 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.16.20067835.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Neville B, Damm DD, Allen C, Chi A. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 4th ed. Missouri: Elsevier; 2015. p. 928.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Campisi G, Russo L, Liberto C, Nicola F, Butera D, Vigneri S, et al. Saliva variations in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. J Dent 2008;36:268-71.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Baliga S, Muglikar S, Kale R. Salivary pH: A diagnostic biomarker. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013;17:461-5.  Back to cited text no. 39
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
40.
Gopinath VK, Arzreanne AR. Saliva as a diagnostic tool for assessment of dental caries. Arch Orofac Sci 2006;1:57-9.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Müller VJ, Belibasakis GN, Bosshard PP, Wiedemeier DB, Bichsel D, Rücker M, et al. Change of saliva composition with radiotherapy. Arch Oral Biol 2019;106:104480.  Back to cited text no. 41
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

   Abstract Introduction Conclusion
  In this article
 References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed366    
    Printed9    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded130    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]