Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Search Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 160
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 153-157

Hand-held X-ray device: A review

Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, AME's Dental College and Hospital, Raichur, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission15-Mar-2018
Date of Acceptance01-Jun-2018
Date of Web Publication16-Jul-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mahalakshmi Wale
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, AME's Dental College and Hospital, Raichur, Karnataka
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_36_18

Rights and Permissions

This is an era of digital revolution where the world is shifting from analogue to digital electronics. This revolution has led to the invention miniaturization of devices and one such invention is hand-held X-ray devices. With the introduction of new technology in dental radiology, there is a need to change or update old guidelines that many states use to regulate the use of ionizing radiation. Currently, there are voluntary guidelines promulgated by the NCRP for dental radiation protection. Many states use the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors Suggested State Regulations for the Control of Radiation to regulate the use of X-ray equipment. Hand-held portable X-ray devices are increasingly used for intraoral radiography. This development introduced new challenges to operator and patient safety, for which new or revised risk assessments must be made and acted upon prior to use.

Keywords: Food and drug administration, intraoral radiography, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement

How to cite this article:
V Ramesh D N, Wale M, Thriveni R, Byatnal A. Hand-held X-ray device: A review. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2018;30:153-7

How to cite this URL:
V Ramesh D N, Wale M, Thriveni R, Byatnal A. Hand-held X-ray device: A review. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 Oct 7];30:153-7. Available from: https://www.jiaomr.in/text.asp?2018/30/2/153/236727

   Introduction Top

An important part of a modern dental examination is radiographic imaging. While there are risks to the use of ionizing radiation, the diagnostic benefits have been determined to outweigh the risks; thus, the procedures have now become routine during regular exams.[1]

The first hand-held portable dental X-ray devices date back to the early 90s of the past century; those devices were intended to be used in the military field. An increase in the marketing of hand-held portable X-ray devices for intraoral radiography in general dental facilities has been recently observed and hand-held portable X-ray devices are valuable online only at present [Figure 1].[2]
Figure 1: Diagrammatic image of NOMADTM hand held X-ray

Click here to view

Types of hand-held X-ray devices

  1. NOMAD
  2. Non-FDA–cleared device [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]
  3. Tube-based X-ray fluorescence (XRF).
Figure 2: Example of a hand-held x-ray device that has not received clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. A. X-ray tube/ casing. B. Control panel. C. Remote control (photograph reproduced with permission of the Health Protection Agency, Leeds, United Kingdom).

Click here to view
Figure 3: Image of patient and operator with hand held X-ray device

Click here to view

Since the introduction of hand-held X-ray units in dentistry, a few inexpensive devices have emerged that lack the necessary safety measures and failed to meet the U.S. Food and Drug Administration standards.[3]

Hand-held X-ray units challenge the concept of a restricted access “controlled area” as they are held by the operator. Although an integral lead shield is provided, the distance from the body is variable and depends on how the device is held.[4]

A new hand-held battery-operated portable X-ray system was tested for possible leakage radiation through the existing heavy metal compounds surrounding the X ray tube, backscatter radiation through the lead-filled acrylic shield attached at the end of the exit tube, and patient exposure.[5]

Some uses permitted with the hand-held unit would be

  1. Use in nursing homes
  2. Home health care
  3. Special needs patients (individuals who require assistance for disabilities such as medical, mental, or psychological)
  4. Sedated patients who are unable to cooperate with the positional requirements of the radiograph
  5. Forensic work
  6. In outreach programs like dental camps.

The current hand-held portable X-ray devices resemble a photographic camera or have a “shotgun” design. The devices are used as a replacement for wall-mounted or semi mobile X-ray devices (on a tripod or mobile support) and differ in two major characteristics from those:

  1. The operator holds the hand-held portable X-ray devices during exposure of the patient, so the operator cannot stand back of radiation protection shields, and therefore, dedicated means of (scatter) radiation protection need to be provided
  2. The newer handheld devices have typically a lower output dose rate (set by current, waveform, filtration and cone length) than the traditional wall-mounted direct current units.[2]

Hand-held portable X-ray devices should only be used in specific cases where it is impractical or impossible to transfer the patient to a fixed mounted X-ray installation and use of mobile devices are not practicable, such as in:

  1. Operation theatres where no fixed mounted X-ray unit is available and the patient is under general anesthesia or sedation. The first choice in this case should be a semi-mobile device
  2. Emergency rooms, surgical suites, patient rooms, or other hospital facilities for immobile patients. The first choice in this case should be a semi-mobile device
  3. Nursing homes, residential care facilities, or homes for persons with disabilities, which compromise mobility or their general health and who are thus unable to attend a healthcare facility. In this case, the follow-up treatment should be considered before justification of the X-ray procedure is made. If follow-up treatment is not available at the site, the patient might need to be moved to a healthcare facility, and X-ray imaging can be performed at the healthcare facility
  4. Detention centre facilities where persons are physically confined and cannot easily be moved or transferred.

Most accepted and cleared by FDA is NOMADTM.

Hand-held X-ray machine offers portability in X-ray technology, featuring cordless operation, rechargeable 14.4-V nickel–cadmium battery packs, and provides more than 100–700 exposures on a single charge. It weighs 8 pounds, has internal lead shielding, and an external lead–acrylic backscatter shield. There is an automatic shut off and “Enable” feature that minimizes the risk of inadvertent exposure.

The hand-held X-ray device uses direct current, operates at a fixed 60 kV, 2.3 mA, and has a 0.4 mm focal spot with a 20 cm source-to-skin distance.[5]

Exposure parameters for hand held X-ray device [Table 1].[1]
Table 1: Exposure parameters for hand held X-ray device

Click here to view

Whole body radiation exposure limit for hand held X-ray device [Table 2].[6]
Table 2: Whole Body Radiation Exposure limit for hand held X-ray device

Click here to view

The high-voltage power supply is a high-frequency DC unit, which reduces the dose to the patient. Second, the X-ray tube is surrounded by compounds of heavy metals to reduce the leakage radiation from the tube.

British Standard BS EN 60601-2-65:2013 sets a limit on tube head leakage of 0.25 mGy an hour averaged over 100 cm 2 at a distance of 1 m, with an added note that, for hand-held equipment, the protection of the operator is subject to the manufacturer's risk assessment process.

The ICRP-60 recommends an annual dose limit of 20 mSv (averaged over 5 years) owing to the occupational exposure of the whole body, 500 mSv for hand dose and 150 mSv for the eye lenses.

The estimated annual effective dose and the annual equivalent dose to the operator's whole body and hands from these devices, when used correctly, were well below 0.25 mSv and 10 mSv, respectively.[7]

The beam limiting device (exit cone) is lined with Pb. This would not normally be required in a dental unit as the exit cone is defined by Pb apertures closer to the tube. However, in our case, backscattered radiation from the patient could travel through the exit cone and impinge on the operators' hand. This backscattered radiation is absorbed in the lead-lined cone.

Backscattered radiation is also absorbed in a Pb-filled acrylic shield attached at the end of the exit cone. This shield has a Pb-equivalent of 0.5 mm thickness, and protects the operators' torso, hands, face, and gonads from backscattered radiation from the patient's face and teeth [Figure 1] and [Figure 3].[1]

Because of its innovative internal shielding, hand-held X-ray machine is safe for the operator to use. The X-ray tube and collimator are enclosed in a proprietary compound that blocks radiation leakage. The leaded acrylic shield at the front of the device provides the operator with a “zone of protection” from backscatter radiation during the actual exposure [Figure 4].[6]
Figure 4: Image showing internal lead shielding and Zone of Protection

Click here to view

Lead apron applicable in hand-held X-ray: The operator to stand at least 1.5 m away from the tube head and patient; lead apron of at least 0.25 mm lead equivalency is needed.[8]

Radiation protection of the patient

The main consideration in any radiographic procedure involving live patients is to reduce the dose to the patient as much as possible while still achieving the diagnostic goals. Hand-held X-ray device is designed to operate with factors that help to maintain the safe operating region:

High-frequency, constant potential has been shown to reduce patient dose by up to 1/3 per image.

  1. System is optimized for digital sensors at 60 kV. Digital sensors reduce the dose per image by 1/4th to 1/10th compared with conventional film
  2. Beam is limited to 6 cm diameter, rather than the allowed 7 cm. This smaller irradiation area reduces the patient dose by 25% without significantly compromising the beam aiming capability.[5]

Radiation protection of the operator

  1. Operators should always wear personal protective equipment (PPE) while using the hand-held equipment to be shielded from backscatter radiation. Both an apron (with 0.5 mm lead equivalent) and thyroid collar are recommended. This X-ray unit must only be operated by trained personnel in a controlled setting
  2. Within such a setting, ensure that only the patient is in the direct beam of the X-ray, and that any ancillary personnel are a minimum of 3 m (approximately 9 feet) away from the patient. If it is necessary for any ancillary personnel to be closer than 3 m, these personnel should stay out of the direct beam.[6]

General population

A radiation risk assessment should always be available for the location in which the handheld portable X-ray device is used. The radiation risk assessment should include a minimum clearance distance (“controlled area”) around the X-ray device and shielding requirements if applicable.[2]

Image quality

The same image quality requirements apply to handheld portable X-ray devices as do to fixed intraoral X-ray units.

  • 0.4 mm focal spot produces sharp, high resolution images. No blur from hand movement
  • High-frequency, 60-kV DC X-ray generator produces clear images while reducing patient dose.

In the study of Pittayapat et al. it was concluded that handheld portable X-ray devices produce satisfactory image quality for use in forensic odontology.

Therefore, only films with speeds designated as E or ideally F-speed or faster or digital image receptors (sensors or phosphor plates) should be used to minimize the required dose.

It has been clinically shown that handheld device produces diagnostic-quality X-rays and will work equally well with both film and digital imaging media.

Hand held device provides all the benefits of DC performance: highest quality images and lowest patient dosage

Hand held X-ray devices as high-frequency, 60 kv DC X-ray generator provides constant radiation output [Figure 5].[7]
Figure 5: (a) Depth and placement check during implant. (b) Placement of implant after surgery. (c) Implant placement following sinus lift

Click here to view

Duty cycle

The hand-held device is also designed to avoid damage from overheating. The minimum duty cycle rating for maximum exposure (the relationship between duration and frequency of exposures taken during a rolling 60 second period) is 1:60. The following table shows examples of optimal use:


AC and DC current

Half wave rectification. The rectifier blocks current flow in the inverse half of the electrical cycle resulting in the flow of the current in one direction only and this is known as half wave rectification as well as self-rectification. This is currently found in most dental X-ray machines. Larger X-ray machine use full wave rectification.

Recently, some X-ray manufacturers have used amplifiers to increase the number of cycles and are claiming that they are obtaining a continuous direct current resulting in a current that has higher energy at the same voltage [Figure 6].[9]
Figure 6: AC and DC current

Click here to view

Product review of NOMAD Tm

The NOMAD Dental X-ray System has been tested and found to comply with the limits of electromagnetic compatibility standards for medical devices, which provide reasonable protection against harmful interference in a typical medical/dental setting.

The NOMAD MD X-ray system is intended for use in the electromagnetic environment as specified. The NOMAD MD uses RF energy only for its internal function. In addition, the housing includes conductive shielding; therefore, while portable and mobile RF communications equipment can affect other medical electrical equipment, the RF emissions of the NOMAD are very low and are not likely to cause any interference in nearby electronic equipment.[10]

Security, storage, and transportation

The optimal storage location is cool, dry, and away from direct sunlight.


The charging for 30 to 45 min can be used for 8 hours. Color red indicates low battery.

Green indicates start and yellow X-rays exposures.

Advantages of hand-held radiography for dental professionals

  • Operator can stay with the patient during X-ray procedures
  • Take radiographs twice as fast as with conventional X-ray systems
  • Reduce number of retakes by up to 50%
  • Move hand-held X-ray devices from room to room, eliminating the need for multiple units
  • Carry anywhere – ideal for hospital, home-health, humanitarian, and out-of-office use
  • The any high degree of flexibility makes it easy to take exposures while the patient is reclined, lying completely on their back, or sitting upright
  • There are less chances of cone-cut and others errors in taking X-rays
  • No need to follow accurate angulations. usually 90° or perpendicular to the film or sensor is maintained
  • Light weight, cordless, easily transportable
  • No awkward arms to manipulate; no drift
  • No need for special stands, cables, remotes
  • Hundreds of diagnostic quality images from a single battery charge
  • Works with sensors, film, phosphor plates
  • Exceptionally valuable in dental surgery suites
  • Perfect for use with sedated patients, children, geriatric or special needs
  • Ideal for general dentistry, humanitarian work, clinics, mobile, home health, hospitals
  • It is rechargeable one so no need of current to operate the device.

Disadvantages of hand-held radiography for dental professionals

  • The main drawback is that ALARA principal is not followed
  • The device must be angled and the operator cannot be completely within the protection zone
  • Compulsory lead apron is necessarily should be worn by the operator
  • Some time the radiofrequency which is used to produce X-ray leads disturbs other operating machines
  • An experienced operator is needed.

   Conclusion Top

The hand-held device is easy to set up and use. It meets radiation safety standards. It has potential for use in forensic dentistry, humanitarian missions and nursing homes, and for disabled patients. This is beneficial for the operator and the patient and is less time consuming. Many more studies have to be conducted to know more about the hand-held X-ray devices.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

   References Top

Turner DC, Kloos DK, Ben John RM. Radiation Safety Characteristics of the NOMAD™ Portable X-ray System. Quality and Regulatory Services, Lincoln, CA 95648 USA.  Back to cited text no. 1
Berkhout WER, Suomalainen A, Brullmann D, Jacobs R, Horner K Stamatakis HC. Justification and good practice in using handheld portable dental X-ray equipment: A position paper prepared by the European Academy of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 2015;44:20140343.  Back to cited text no. 2
Mahdian M, Pakchoian AJ, Dagdeviren D, Alzahrani A, Jalali E, Tadinada A, et al. Using hand-held dental x-ray devices: Ensuring safety for patients and operators; JADA 2014;145:1130-2.  Back to cited text no. 3
Makdissi J, Pawar RR, Johnson B, Chong BS. The effects of device position on the operator's radiation dose when using a handheld portable X-ray device; Dental and Maxillofacial Radiologyx.  Back to cited text no. 4
Goren AD, Bonvento M, Biernacki J, Colosi DC. Radiation exposure with the NOMADTM portable X-ray system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:109-11.  Back to cited text no. 5
Aribex and NOMAD are trademarks of Aribex, Complies with DHHS Rules, 21 CFR Subchapter J applicable at time of manufacture: April 2007.  Back to cited text no. 6
Hosseini Pooya SM, Hafezi L, Manafi F, Talaeipour AR. Assessment of the radiological safety of a Genoray portable dental X-ray unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44:20140255.  Back to cited text no. 7
Gulson AD, Holroyd JR, Guidance on the Safe Use of Hand-held Dental X-ray Equipment: Prepared by Public Health England's Dental X-ray Protection Services, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Leeds: Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Public Health England. December 2015.  Back to cited text no. 8
Introduction to radiation physics. Neill Serman White and Pharoah. Principles of Dental Imaging. Ch. 1. Sept. 00.  Back to cited text no. 9
Aribex NOMAD Portable X-ray System for Intraoral Radiographic Imaging: USER MANUAL.  Back to cited text no. 10


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

   Abstract Introduction Conclusion Article Figures Article Tables
  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded1443    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal